EaseUS proved very reliable with Microsoft Office file types, including the elusive ACCDB (Microsoft Access 2007+). We concluded our challenge with the document recovery test. ![]() However, we were impressed that Stellar was able to restore our BRAW files, which many data recovery software don’t support (including EaseUS). Stellar recognized less than half of the file types we tested, and of those it recognized, the quality of recovery was subpar. It supports the most common video file types such as 360 (GoPro), AVI, MOV, MP4, WMV, and even INSV. In comparison, Stellar missed 16 file types out of 37, including those of common manufacturers like Nikon, Konica, Samsung, Canon, GoPro, Hasselblad, and more.īoth apps did slightly worse when we attempted video recovery, but EaseUS produced decent results. However, the amount of data recovered per file type varies. It missed 5 out of the 37 file types we tested: X3i, MPO, JP2, INSP, and EXR. When testing RAW photo recovery, EaseUS was obviously superior. Our three categories are RAW photo recovery, video recovery, and document recovery. ![]() ![]() During our real-life recovery challenge, we aim to do two things: (1) discover what commonly used file types Stellar Data Recovery and EaseUS Recovery Wizard recognize, and (2) how much of each file type these apps can restore.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |